Com­pu­ta­tional fluid dynam­ics, CFD in short, is pri­mar­ily used for numer­i­cal mod­el­ing of gas and liquid flows. CFD enables Oilon’s experts to sim­u­late dif­fer­ent processes, such as a burner’s oper­a­tion far ahead of build­ing a phys­i­cal pro­to­type. This speeds up and reduces the cost of devel­op­ment, and the end result is better overall.

Nitro­gen oxides (NOx com­pounds) are gases made up of nitro­gen and oxygen. These com­pounds react with hydro­car­bons in the atmos­phere, forming fine par­ti­cles. Both the gaseous NOx emis­sions and these sec­ondary par­tic­u­late emis­sions cause res­pi­ra­tory prob­lems, increase the risk of car­dio­vas­cu­lar disease, and have various other harmful effects. They also con­tribute to soil and water acid­i­fi­ca­tion and eutroph­i­ca­tion and are harmful to plant life.

Global race to reduce NOx emis­sions

Nitro­gen oxides are formed in all types of com­bus­tion. However, the main sources are traffic and energy pro­duc­tion. When com­bus­tion occurs at high tem­per­a­tures, oxygen and nitro­gen react with each other, forming nitro­gen oxides. The bulk of these oxides are released as nitro­gen monox­ide (NO), which will grad­u­ally oxidize in the atmos­phere, forming nitro­gen dioxide (NO2) and other nitro­gen com­pounds.

Years of study have revealed three major for­ma­tion mech­a­nisms for NOx: fuel, thermal, and prompt. In the first process, organic hydro­gen present in fuels is oxi­dized, forming NOx. Fuel oils and, in par­tic­u­lar, coal, have a high nitro­gen content. Com­bus­tion and boiler tech­nol­ogy can be used to reduce the amount of NOx created from organic nitro­gen. However, due to high initial con­cen­tra­tions, flue gas scrub­bing (SCR) is also often required.

Thermal NOx, in turn, is formed when the bonds within a nitro­gen mol­e­cule break down at a high tem­per­a­ture, and the released nitro­gen atoms become oxi­dized. This for­ma­tion mech­a­nism can be effec­tively addressed with com­bus­tion tech­nol­ogy. Con­se­quently, when firing fuels that do not contain organic nitro­gen (e.g. natural gas), low emis­sion levels can be achieved without after treat­ment.

The third mech­a­nism, prompt NOx, is asso­ci­ated with the ratio of fuel and oxygen within the furnace; typ­i­cally, this process pro­duces con­sid­er­ably fewer emis­sions than the former two.

Nations around the globe are increas­ingly reduc­ing their NOx emis­sions. This requires con­tin­u­ous advances in com­bus­tion and boiler tech­nol­ogy, but there is also another factor to con­sider: which fuel to use. Oilon has made devel­op­ing Low-NOx com­bus­tion tech­nol­ogy a pri­or­ity, and, in recent years, the company’s efforts have focused espe­cially on low-NOx solu­tions for natural gas. Let’s take a look at one example.

LN30 Ultra low NOx – a new family of burners

“This is where the magic happens, in the com­bus­tion head,” says Joonas Kat­telus, R&D Direc­tor, Com­bus­tion Tech­nol­ogy at Oilon Oy. “Last spring, we intro­duced the all-new Monoblock LN30 product family. When firing natural gas in these burners, we can achieve the ultra-​low NOx limit, 9 ppm, going down to 5 ppm and beyond. These are premix burners with a long, tubular com­bus­tion head. The small­est member in the family has a maximum capac­ity of 900 kW (3.4 MMbtu/h) and the largest, 4.9 MW (18.6 MMBtu/h). These are indus­trial burners, and rep­re­sent our mid-​range models; power plant burners are a topic for another day.”
“There have been other premix burners on the market for years already; however, what we are now offer­ing is con­sid­er­ably better than any pre­vi­ous models. For example, let’s compare our new solu­tion to pre-mix mesh burner tech­nol­ogy, where the fuel–air mixture is homog­e­nized as much as pos­si­ble by feeding it into the furnace through a tight mesh. Our LN30 burners have no mesh; instead, we use a long tube with nozzles at the other end for feeding the fuel and air [into the furnace] for com­bus­tion.”

Kat­telus explains that a mesh-​based burner requires extremely clean com­bus­tion air, as oth­er­wise impu­ri­ties would clog up the mesh in the com­bus­tion head. In prac­tice, effec­tive fil­tra­tion is a must, and the filter itself would require fre­quent clean­ing. This tech­nol­ogy cannot be used in dusty envi­ron­ments. The burners in the LN30 series have no filter; no filter is required, as there are no small open­ings prone to clog­ging.

Low NOx emis­sions at low resid­ual oxygen levels

“One sig­nif­i­cant new char­ac­ter­is­tic of the LN30 series is its reduced resid­ual oxygen (O2) level,” Kat­telus con­tin­ues. “In tra­di­tional premix burners, the 9-ppm NOx limit can be achieved only with a 7–8% resid­ual oxygen level. We can achieve this with an O2 level as low as 4–6%. At 6–8 % O2, we can go as low as 5 ppm. Nat­u­rally, our goal is to get the resid­ual oxygen level as low as pos­si­ble, as this will improve effi­ciency.”

“We were able to fine-​tune our premix very close to per­fec­tion, result­ing in a major boost in per­for­mance. We’ve devel­oped the mixing process entirely with CFD. By select­ing the right shape for the com­bus­tion head and the nozzles, and with proper nozzle place­ment, we managed to keep the flame extremely compact. The flame fits well even in a smaller furnace.”

Kat­telus elab­o­rates that a perfect premix will also reduce the risk of CO for­ma­tion. Typ­i­cally, when NOx levels go down, CO levels go up. With a perfect premix, all CO is con­sumed and the problem is avoided.

Another benefit of a long com­bus­tion head is that it pro­motes inter­nal flue gas recir­cu­la­tion (IFGR) in the front section of the furnace. In this process, inert flue gas is mixed into the fuel–air mixture. This cools down the flame, reduc­ing the for­ma­tion of NOx com­pounds.
“Tra­di­tion­ally, flue gas mixing has been achieved using exter­nal flue gas recir­cu­la­tion (FGR), where flue gas is fed into the furnace from the outside. This requires sep­a­rate duct­work, a control valve and pos­si­bly a fan for trans­port­ing the flue gas, result­ing in a higher initial cost. Another problem in these kinds of appli­ca­tions is con­den­sate, which causes cor­ro­sion in the equip­ment, short­en­ing its useful life. More­over, FGR reduces the burner’s capac­ity.”
Accord­ing to Kat­telus, Oilon has ver­i­fied its new burner family’s deliv­ery reli­a­bil­ity and per­for­mance with exten­sive lab­o­ra­tory testing. The prod­ucts have also been UL-​certified. Cur­rently, the company is in the process of pilot­ing the burners with ref­er­ence cases across the United States. The company’s been deliv­er­ing LN30 prod­ucts in other markets for a couple of years, and the results have been good. Oilon has patents pending for the new tech­nol­ogy in Europe, North America and China.

CFD-​modeling is the key to excel­lent engi­neer­ing and devel­op­ment

For almost 15 years, Oilon has uti­lized CFD cal­cu­la­tion in burner engi­neer­ing and devel­op­ment. Today, CFD is one of the main devel­op­ment tools used at Oilon. In the early ears, CFD cal­cu­la­tions took a long time to process and tended to deliver inac­cu­rate results, and the tool was rel­e­gated to a sup­port­ive role. However, as pro­cess­ing power increased, com­pu­ta­tional models matured and the company’s know-​how expanded, CFD became more viable, and has now served several years as the company’s primary devel­op­ment tool.

“Today, we develop our prod­ucts largely using CFD sim­u­la­tion. In most cases, the values we get are pretty much exactly the same as those from testing the actual phys­i­cal pro­to­type,” Kat­telus says. “We used to make several of pro­to­types during burner devel­op­ment, and testing each of these took a long time. Now, thanks to CFD, we get better results faster and with fewer costs, even in a land­scape rife with increas­ingly strin­gent require­ments. On one hand, the boiler indus­try tends to keep furnace sizes as small as pos­si­ble to reduce costs, and on the other, leg­is­la­tion aims to reduce emis­sion levels. There is a con­flict between these two, as a smaller furnace will increase NOx emis­sions.”

“Nat­u­rally, both boiler per­for­mance and the amount of NOx emis­sions depends on both parts of the sum: the burner and the furnace. Emis­sion levels depend on several para­me­ters, but the main rule is that improv­ing the trans­mis­sion of heat from the flame to the furnace will always reduce NOx emis­sions. There are many ways to improve this, such as opti­miz­ing furnace dimen­sions, furnace cor­ru­ga­tion, and min­i­miz­ing the use of refrac­tory. CFD mod­el­ing allows us to work with boiler man­u­fac­tur­ers to ensure the best pos­si­ble result.”

Unique CFD know-​how and an excel­lent lab­o­ra­tory

Over the years, Oilon has acquired an exten­sive expe­ri­ence and a unique know-​how in uti­liz­ing CFD-​modeling. This exper­tise is sup­ported by excel­lent lab­o­ra­tory facil­i­ties in the company’s product devel­op­ment center. These form a com­bi­na­tion that is hard to beat: mea­sure­ments from the lab­o­ra­tory are used to develop CFD models, which, in turn, are ver­i­fied and further tested in the lab­o­ra­tory. Accord­ing to Kat­telus, the company has the world’s most advanced natural gas com­bus­tion models, espe­cially when it comes to emis­sion mod­el­ling.